<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Art and the Bible by Francis Schaeffer, Part I</title>
	<link>http://iconia.canonist.com/2007/08/06/art-and-the-bible-by-francis-schaeffer-part-i/</link>
	<description>Wherever faith meets art.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Iconia&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Art and the Bible by Francis Schaeffer, Part II</title>
		<link>http://iconia.canonist.com/2007/08/06/art-and-the-bible-by-francis-schaeffer-part-i/#comment-9969</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iconia.canonist.com/2007/08/06/art-and-the-bible-by-francis-schaeffer-part-i/#comment-9969</guid>
					<description>[...] The Aesthetic Elevator posted an interesting response to part one of my review of Art and the Bible, and I would like to clarify my position. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Aesthetic Elevator posted an interesting response to part one of my review of Art and the Bible, and I would like to clarify my position. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Aesthetic Elevator</title>
		<link>http://iconia.canonist.com/2007/08/06/art-and-the-bible-by-francis-schaeffer-part-i/#comment-9920</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iconia.canonist.com/2007/08/06/art-and-the-bible-by-francis-schaeffer-part-i/#comment-9920</guid>
					<description>I've read Art and the Bible at least twice. I don't remember having the objection you've raised as I went through it — that "chaeffer has yet to prove convincingly that a Christian should embrace the arts any more than she or he should embrace curling or archery or building sand castles" — but it's been a couple of years now. 

That said I think it only represents the beginnings of an important theological work that no one else has taken on yet, at least to my knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read Art and the Bible at least twice. I don&#8217;t remember having the objection you&#8217;ve raised as I went through it — that &#8220;chaeffer has yet to prove convincingly that a Christian should embrace the arts any more than she or he should embrace curling or archery or building sand castles&#8221; — but it&#8217;s been a couple of years now. </p>
<p>That said I think it only represents the beginnings of an important theological work that no one else has taken on yet, at least to my knowledge.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
